70% Of Americans Just Fine With Surveillance Cameras | KXNet.com North Dakota News
|
|||||||||||
|
Home |
Voices
|
Blogs
|
SayAnything 70% Of Americans Just Fine With Surveillance CamerasDisclaimer: This article is a blog post and does not represent the views
or opinions of Reiten Television, KXNet.com, its staff and associates and is wholly owned by
the user who posted this content.
Jul 30 2007 12:00AM
http://sayanythingblog.com/index.php I’m not surprised at this outcome, because honestly the debate over it has always baffled me
It’s worth noting these cameras simply document people while they’re out in public. If we strip all the paranoid “Big Brother” rhetoric from this issue, the questions we need to ask ourselves are these: Are our actions in public private? Do we have an expectation of privacy while on private property?
The answer to those of those is, of course, “no.” Anyone can see you, video tape you and/or photograph you while you’re out in public. It’s not illegal for them to do so, nor can you legally (except within the bounds of what could be considered harassment under current law) ask them to stop
Of course, if you don’t think the government should be spending your tax dollars on these video cameras, that’s fine. But there’s nothing illegal or even all that objectionable about them. And keep in mind that it’s not just the government that uses them. If you start getting harassed by a cop or something, or if someone commits a crime against you, look around. If there’s a surveillance camera nearby you can undoubtedly get the tape with a simple subpoena. Meaning that these surveillance cameras are every bit as useful to the private citizen as to the government
I’m as worried about big government encroaching on our lives as the next person, but the fight over the legality public surveillance cameras is both a waste of time as, again, they are explicitly legal and every bit as useful as a tool to keep government honest as it is a tool for the government to keep “dibs” on us
Disclaimer: This article is a blog post and does not represent the views or opinions of Reiten Television, KXNet.com, its staff and associates and is wholly owned by the user who posted this content. Comments Posted by KXNet.com Users
Posted by Lawrence Glazer on Aug 6 2007 12:24PM -
Yours is a very cogent argument for the growing use of surveillance cameras. Yet your view is both near and short sighted. There is a qualitative difference between being photographed in public and government surveillance. History has shown that once a freedom or liberty is taken away, it is never restored. Recent history has shown that governments all over the world are taking away hard won freedoms in the name of security. Taken with the growing secrecy of governments; most often in the name of national security, it would be foolish and dangerous to ignore. As one of your founding fathers once said, "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin
More Blogs
Related Categories
jump to a KXNet category:
|
Advertise on KXNet.com!
Reaching over 300,000 people - Every Month! KXNet.com is the #1 TV News website in the entire state of North Dakota - Contact us Today!
![]() Join the KXNews Facebook Group More Social Networking
Around Town Fan Club on Facebook | KX News Morning on Twitter | Around Town on Twitter | Donnell Preskey on Twitter
![]() |
||||||||||