Hillary Clinton: How Dare You Call Universal Health Care Socialized Medicine | KXNet.com North Dakota News
|
|||||||||||
|
Home |
Voices
|
Blogs
|
SayAnything Hillary Clinton: How Dare You Call Universal Health Care Socialized MedicineDisclaimer: This article is a blog post and does not represent the views
or opinions of Reiten Television, KXNet.com, its staff and associates and is wholly owned by
the user who posted this content.
Aug 10 2007 12:00AM
http://sayanythingblog.com/index.php Hillary goes off on a reporter at the National Association of Black Journalists Presidential Forum for daring to call socialized medicine...well...socialized medicine
Video here What do you think she’s angry about more, that she’s essentially being called a socialist or that a black man dared wander off the liberal plantation to question her “we liberals know what’s best for you” policies? A couple of choice quotes from the accompanying article. First up, Hillary objecting to the “socialized medicine” label:
But, it’s not wrong. The health care system Hillary Clinton and her fellow Democrats support consists of taking wealth from everyone (or, more accurately, the top 50% of wage-earners who pay all the taxes) and redistributing it to everyone in the form of medical care. Wealth redistribution, put simply. And what is socialism if not wealth redistribution?
That Hillary and her fellow populist commissar-wannabes find this label inconvenient for their political agendas is neither here nor there Next, Hillary backs up her support for socialized medicine by championing...Medicare:
I’m not sure why Hillary is shown as winning this debate. She didn’t answer the guy’s question. All she did, basically, was call him stupid (or uneducated, to use her terminology) for not agreeing with her
Regardless, I always have to chuckle when liberals hold up Medicare as an example of why we should have government-run medical care. Because, really, Medicare is probably one of the best arguments against government-run medicine there is
This year alone Medicare is expected to cost this country some $540 billion, a figure President Bush is “trimming”, according to the media, by dampening it’s growth from a projected 8.1% to 7.7% annually. Meaning that we’ll still spend more than $540 billion on Medicaid next year and the year after that, just not as much more as previously projected
Medicaid is also a gigantic expense for taxpayers, costing about $330 billion in 2005 alone, an amount that also, historically, grows at about a 7 - 8% yearly clip Together, Medicaid and Medicare represent a portion of our nation’s spending as a percentage of the GDP that is becoming enormous. It is projected to actually outpace the growth in Social Security spending we’re all so worried about:
![]()
For a group of people who would like us to believe that spending on the war in Iraq is unsustainable, they sure don’t have any qualms about spiraling entitlement expenses which are constantly burdening American tax payers with more and more taxes. Because to this observer, Medicare spending is unsustainable
So know full well that when Hillary says she supports “universal health care” she has not a care about the gigantic, irresponsible expense it would represent for this country
Disclaimer: This article is a blog post and does not represent the views or opinions of Reiten Television, KXNet.com, its staff and associates and is wholly owned by the user who posted this content.
More Blogs |
Advertise on KXNet.com!
Reaching over 300,000 people - Every Month! KXNet.com is the #1 TV News website in the entire state of North Dakota - Contact us Today!
![]() Join the KXNews Facebook Group More Social Networking
Around Town Fan Club on Facebook | KX News Morning on Twitter | Around Town on Twitter | Donnell Preskey on Twitter
![]() |
||||||||||
end of story
and im waitin on my money
thank you :]
We have socialized police protection, socialized fire protection, socialized transportation (we call them "public roads" but that just hides the fact that they are socialist) and other vital public services. Health care in the US has deteriorated so that Doctors make more money by prescribing pills than they do by curing people. Hospitals make more money by getting rid of patients as soon as possible rather thahn healing people. This greed based medical system is a great failure, exacerbated by the wealthy health industry's huge campaign contributions. The "fixed system" we have is indeed a transfer of wealth, stealing from the working people to fill the already overflowing coffers of the elite.
Our current Health Care system has become badly broken due to overwhelming greed of companies like Kaiser, Humana, Phizer, etc.
The whole scray "Marxist" thing has worn thin, allowing our country to be run by oil, banking, and health industry interests (who does your congressman really represent?) instead of being run by and for the people would make our founding fathers spin in their graves.
THE U. S. SENATE BACKGROUND.
Despite the efforts of some, in 2008 the U.S. Congress still has not been accountable for the DOD âto harmâ human experiments! [8] As now by BARDA conducted on you. [11] This is for the from 1944, 1994 U.S. Senate Reportâs, now ongoing 64 years of: âINTRODUCTIONâ A. "During the last 50 years, hundreds of thousands of military personnel have been involved in human experimentation and other intentional exposures conducted by the Department of Defense (DOD), often without a servicemember's knowledge or consent.", B. "most Americans would agree that the use of soldiers as unwitting guinea pigs in experiments that were designed to harm them, at least temporarily, is not ethical." And âFORWARDâ C. "The findings and conclusions contained in this report are those of the majority staff and do not necessarily reflect the views of the members of the Committee on Veterans' Affairs." Chairman.. The DOD & VA HEALTH CARE is under its, âIII. Findings and conclusionsâ by the, âK. DOD and DVA have repeatedly failed to provide information and medical followup to those who participate in military research...â and âN. Participation in military research is rarely included in military medical records, making it impossible to support a veteranâs claim for service-connected disabilities from military research.â [8] In 2008 continued is a of a version of the DOD Project 112 biological lessons learned. [9] On 19 December 2006 established was the civilian âBiomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA)â. [11] Under the cover of its "NATIONAL SECURITY MISSIONS" withheld from the civilian âguinea pigsâ are the results of its âBiomedicalâ Research and Development (R&D) Projects.
ALL IS IN THE RECORD!
Each Executive Branch (DOD, CIA & BARDA) Project completes the R&D process. The prior lessons learned are reviewed. The then Scope of Work defines what the experiment is "designed" to do. The how, where, when and who is identified. The conducted RESEARCHED cause and effects are closely followed. From the results are DEVELOPED safe production, use, the needed for treatment and protection, e.g., the DOD manufacturers handling of hazardous materials such as Depleted Uranium, Agent Orange, the biological agents of Project 112 [9] and the jet-engine noise levels of Project 7210 [2]. All is in the Executive Branch record! Under the cover of national security the revealing treatment evidence: 1. Is not cause identified in a subjectâs Medical History, so that they never the wiser become. The deceived victimâs "to harm" effects are not Medical History recorded, therefore not addressed! Prevented is any follow up by independent civilian and Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) physicians. And 2. For veteransâ the resulting 64 years of experiment specific injuries are not in the VA "schedule of ratings for disabilities" [7] !
From 1953 the U.S. Senate "to harm" lessons learned were in direct disobedience of the DOD Secretary's TOP SECRET, right to say no order. [4] Then known by the Secretary's of all Services, Joint Chiefs of Staff, and their R&D Board. It was "UNCLASSIFIED" on 8/22/75. Nineteen (19) years later, during the U.S. Senateâs reported past 50 years, most of the "to harm" service records were destroyed in a 1973 National Personnel Records Center (NPRC) fire. Those that survived had all witnesses censored by Congressâs 1974 Privacy Act! The "Veterans Right to Know Act" was proposed in the 2005 and H.R. 4259 [109th] 2006 Congress. It never became law.
THE U.S. SUPREME COURT DID NOT KNOW?
The 1987 U.S. Supreme Court STANLEY decision [5] extends the coverage of their 1950 FERES Case that a death by a military barracks fire was an "incident to service" [1]. STANLEY treats the 1958 DOD "experiments...designed to harm" disobedience of the 1953 order [4] as also an "incident to service"! The next year was the U.S. Congressâs few 1988 Veteransâ Judicial Review Act. Established was the Veteranâs Legislative severely restricted, Article I Court. "The court may not review the schedule of ratings for disabilities or the policies underlying the schedule.", i.e., the order ignored "to harm" R&D experimental effects and their causes! The Veterans Court Chief Judge's no teeth statement with his noted VA ignoring of the Courtâs decisions! [7] The Secretary of the VA was given FINAL DECISION authority on these issues. [10] Included is the power of NO APPEAL to this LEGISLATIVE Veterans Court or to the independent U.S. Judicial Branch Courts. If allowed an APPEAL, it is not part of the record at the Article I Veterans Court. Itâs also missing at the next appeal at the U.S. Judicial Branch Article III, Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
HOW IT IS DONE.
AN âIN HIS SERVICE RECORDâ EXAMPLE!
A 1952-1956 USAF Jet Aircraft Mechanic. A picked "volunteer" member of a special F86-D Flight Test evaluation group. The prior to 1949 researched and developed ear muffs, flight line noise protection was not available. An exposure that resulted in an 8 day 1953 sick & dizzy (nausea & vertigo) hospitalization. After there was Aviation Cadet training. During which was the USAF Physician's 1954 Cadet Wing Commander washout examâs, "Had some trouble with hearing while working on warm-up crew for F86-D with very high noise levels." This is an unprotected, repeated exposure to its PROJECT 7210, J47 jet-engine, from a 60 decibel (dB.) normal hearing base, 158 dB. to over 176 dB. afterburner noise level. [2] An American Medical Association (A.M.A.) 87,381 to over 699,051 sound pressure multiple (X). [3] Reassigned back to the same base and Flight Test position. A USAF Physician's 6 months after the washout exam get him off the flight line memo! Then the year later 1955 USAF Physician's do not expose to "loud acoustic trauma". The 1956 Separation from Service recorded perfect health with the 1953, 8 days sick & dizzy (nausea & vertigo) as an in-hospital "4 DAY COLD".
In 1957 was the VA Rating Board 10% hearing loss only. Administrator overlooked was the in-service evidence. It resulted in the to-date VA Administrator also overlooked, "MPerR PERMANENT" "SURGEON HQ ARRC JUN 25' 58 MEDICALLY DISQUALIFIED FOR MILITARY SERVICE"! After which is the "disqualified" âmust have been a mistakeâ by the 1959 DOD Administrator "Honorable Discharge" with its "Recommended for reenlistment - Yes"!
Acting on the advice of HMO Physicians the veteran returned to the VA in 1991. Observed was that the VA Physician exam records were incomplete. In 1994 a VA Criminal Investigator noted as misplaced the original VA 1957 received records. Then a 1995 VA Laymen Adjudicatorâs medical diagnosis that the 1957 award was an all in the mind âperceptive type hearing lossâ! In