Because I guess the concerns of the minority of transgendered people who feel more comfortable in a unisex locker room trump those of the majority who might not want to shower up in front of strangers of the opposite sex

The governing council in Montgomery County, Md., is considering adopting an “open doors” policy to its public restrooms, locker rooms and other facilities to meet the demands of a transgender “non-discrimination” plan, which would allow men into women’s lockers and vice versa, a support group reports

A similar federal non-discrimination plan proposed by homosexual Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., includes a provision that would prevent “transgenders” from using opposite-sex public facilities in which being seen “fully unclothed” was unavoidable, according to Peter Sprigg, a spokesman for Parents and Friends of Ex-Gays & Gays

But he said correspondence with the county staff shows that such a provision was considered, and deliberately rejected, in the county plan, which is scheduled for a vote Nov. 13

“Montgomery County is unwilling to make any such exception,” he told WND. “It’s very extreme.”

Right.  Because not letting transsexual man into the woman’s locker room is an “extreme” policy

People are always going on and on about minority rights.  But what about majority rights?  Why should the rest of us have to compromise on an issue like this because a fractional portion of the population is confused about what gender they are?

save this article / add to your favorites list