E-85:Does it pay? Part 2 | KXNet.com North Dakota News
|
|||||||||||
E-85:Does it pay? Part 2Nov 10 2006 8:45PM
KXMBTV Bismarck The state has already invested about $600 million into new Ethanol Plants. When all of the plants, including the two existing ones, are up and running the state will be producing a minimum of 386 million gallons of ethanol a year. But for you, the consumer, is ethanol blended fuels the right thing to pump into your car? Brad Feldman joins us now with his special report. E-85, does it pay? Ethanol blended fuels have been under the microscope lately, especially E-85. A recent issue of Consumer Reports put E-85 to the test. They used a 2007 Chevrolet Tahoe to see how it runs on E-85 and regular gas. Their findings show that although the alternative fuel is good for the environment it can cost you more at the pump (Shane Goettle/ ND Dept. of Commerce) "Consumers have to make their own choices on this and have to be a little bit of their own scientists in terms of gas mileage." We went to Ressler Chevrolet in Mandan to see for ourselves. We looked at this 2007 Chevrolet Impala LT. Sticker price on this vehicle is about $24,000. The vehicle specs show that on regular gasoline this car can go about 312 to 474 miles per tank of gas. This is about 18 to 28 miles per gallon When you put E-85 in this vehicle the gas mileage drops. On the same size tank you will only be able to drive about 229-330 miles. This is about 13 to 19 miles per gallon (Mike Thomas/ Ressler Chevrolet) "A lot of people are concerned about what kind of mileage you get with E-85 and how does it affect your engine and is it good or bad for your engine." To break this down even further we went ahead and figured out how much you would pay on fuel per year. We based this on someone who travels 15,000 miles using todays prices. $2.17 for regular gas and $1.87 for E-85 In this chart you can see how many times a year you would have to fill The next row shows how many gallons of fuel you would burn in a year. The end result is how much you would spend on fuel If you get the minimum gas mileage projected for this car, you would spend about $300 more a year using E-85 If you get the maximum gas mileage, you would spend about $275 more However, gas mileage is not the only concern. Just finding a station with an E-85 pump can be difficult (Kim Christianson/ ND Dept. of Commerce) "There's a fair number of stations available in the state. I will say it's concentrated more in the eastern half of the state. The western half we still have a way to go there so." According to the North Dakota Corn Growers website there are currently 31 E-85 stations in the state. This map shows you where the stations are located (Kim Christianson/ ND Dept. of Commerce) "I suspect part of it is that the corn growers are more involved in the eastern half of the state. Maybe access to supplies is a little bit better in the eastern half of the state. But we are making some headway in the west and that is our intention to have a good statewide network of E-85 stations." For the last two years Christianson has be leading the state's GO E Campaign (Kim Christianson/ ND Dept. of Commerce) "One of our intentions was to boost the amount of ethanol blended gallons of motor fuel sold in the state. At the time we started we were around 30-percent in North Dakota and our goal was to get to 50 percent In the span of one year, North Dakotans pumped about 351 million gallons of fuel into their cars. Almost half of the fuel sold had an ethanol blend Christianson says as the new ethanol plants get up and running he expects to see the number of people using ethanol blended fuel to rise. If you would like to read the entire article in Consumer Reports, you can log onto www.consumerreports.com. All you have to do is search "Ethanol Myth."
|
Advertise on KXNet.com!
Reaching over 300,000 people - Every Month! KXNet.com is the #1 TV News website in the entire state of North Dakota - Contact us Today!
![]() Join the KXNews Facebook Group More Social Networking
Around Town Fan Club on Facebook | KX News Morning on Twitter | Around Town on Twitter | Donnell Preskey on Twitter
![]() |
||||||||||
Increased performance is obvious, at least it is in my vehicle, a Ford Ranger. I read the Consumer Reports article and they state no difference in acceleration in the Tahoe. I disagree with that because when you go from regular 87 octane gas to 105 octane E-85, there would have to be an increase in performance. Perhaps that's why race-car drivers are using this alcohol fuel?
Mileage in my Ranger drops from 24 mpg with regular gas to 20 mpg with E-85 and that's at a speed of 65 miles per hour. If you think about how motorists disregard the speed limit these days, it's no wonder mileage is so poor. If we would all drive the speed limit, our mileage would increase.
Another thing not mentioned in the KX segment is how E-85 will perform during a cold, North Dakota winter. As you know, it's mostly alcohol so you won't get gas line freeze up and crystals won't form in your gas line in the 40 below range.
Last winter I saw numerous people placing gas line anti freeze in their vehicles while I simply fueled up with E-85. Most gas line anti freeze today is isopropyl alcohol, which you don't need when you use a fuel that already has alcohol in it.
Something needs to be done to get us away from our dependence on foreign oil. If motorists aren't willing to sacrifice 4 miles per gallon and protect the environment, well, then we'll just remain at the mercy of the oil companies and the jobs that could have been created in North Dakota, will most likely end up in Minnesota where the demand for E-85 continues to grow rapidly.
Our nation is entering an era called "Peak Oil". What this means is basically we are using more oil than we are pumping out of the ground & refining. We felt the pinch of Peak Oil this summer with the high gas prices. It's only going to get worse.
Some say there is plenty of oil left in the world. While in terms of quantity, these people may be right, but that oil is far too expensive to drill and are in areas in political controversy (ex ANWAR, which would only give us 60 months of oil at our current consumption rate anyway).
SO BOTTOM LINE; in 10-15 years time, cheap and affordable oil will be GONE. PERIOD. That's it. Look around the things in your daily life that require or are made from oil. Now imagine those things gone. Basically, our whole economic system and way of life would collapse.
Ethanol is a start, don't get me wrong. However, if you compare ethanol production per calorie unit (amount of energy needed to plant and cultivate the corn, transport it, energy needed to refine it, and transport it to the pump), the ratio is 1.13% productivity. It *barely* breaks even. Keep in mind that most tractors and semi trucks are diesel powered (from OIL).
You also have to keep in mind, especially in a decade with abnormal weather patterns; what if the midwest corn belt is hit with a drought?
My proposal still lies within hydrogen and coal technology. I feel our money is better spent in researching how to create STABLE hydrogen fuel cells for vehicles (because keep in mind, the Hindenberg was filled with hydrogen!).
I have since learned that during coal-to-steam power production (such as in Beulah), there is a process to reclaim the waste exhaust and turn it into hydrogen fuel. Talk about killing two birds with one stone! It would turn our country away from oil very quickly.
So...
1a - Coal : with our 250 yr supply in ND, build more coal plants to power our electrical grid. You would also get hydrogen out of it.
1b - Hydrogen : fuel our nation's vehicles.
2 - Nuclear : build federally-funded nuclear power plants along the east and west coast where coal production is scarce.
3 - Solar and Wind : In North Dakota, small to mid-sized towns could easily be powered off of 10-15 wind turbines and be independent of the national grid. Encourage citizens to install solar panels and offer tax incentives to do so (solar technology is on the verge of becoming affordable for even middle-class families). Of course, remain connected to the coal grid in case of outages.
4 - Ethanol and Biodiesel : Power our nation's farmers and semi drivers. Basically create a self-sustaining system.
5 - Oil : The catchall for things unable to be powered/manufactured by items listed above (airplanes, plastics, ect).
Yes, I am a hippie. But unless we start thinking like hippies, our way of life as we know and enjoy it is no longer.
So please press your local and state senators and reps and tell them to push for a common sense energy strategy that does NOT involve oil! The sooner that happens, the sooner our troops come home (and yes, final thought = we are in Iraq because of the oil. That region has 60% of the remaining oil reserves in the world. Bush basically bought us a few years by doing what he did).
Anyway, please chime in and tell me if anything seems wrong with my figures.