Disclaimer: This talk forum post is submitted by users
and does not represent the views
or opinions of Reiten Television, KXNet.com, its staff and associates.
 
Viewing page 1 of 2
|
Next Page
|
go to page: 1, 2
|
| For Those Of Wanting A New Party Or Reconstruction of The Republican Party |
|
Posted On: Nov 5 2009 9:48AM
Can you please make sure that you don't bring religion into it.. Can it please be an organization of debate and thought and not of lies and greed? Can it please stand for it's principals and if someone doesn't can we please kick them out of the party? |
|
|
Posted On: Nov 5 2009 9:58AM
What are you trying to say Sicko? Third party? Kicking out Rinos? Holding republicans responsible for abiding by our GOP platform? NOt voting with the dems all the time? Not crossing the isle (Compromise)?
What are you really saying?
See, no religion.
|
|
|
Posted On: Nov 5 2009 10:27AM
For instance, I am talking about when you hold congress and the presidential office you shouldn't increase spending monumentally. When your party preaches fiscal responsibilities.
|
|
|
Posted On: Nov 5 2009 10:43AM
You may not be meaning too, but when you say fiscally responsible, you are talking about GOP... I believe you are saying GOP is the problem, and I am here to say they are not the total problem.
Again, what are you saying? What would you like to see happen?
|
|
|
Posted On: Nov 5 2009 1:51PM
Can't do that, won't do that. Like it or not, but this country was founded on a platform of Christian morals.
True conservatism is based on Christian morals. To me it is impossible to separate conservatism, Repubicanism, from Christianity.
If you want a platform in which there is no such thing as right and wrong or morals, Obama is willing to take you into the fold. He is your saviour.
|
|
|
Posted On: Nov 5 2009 2:16PM
I think the ideal canadiate woulde be a fiscally conservative dem.
I would settle for a fiscally conservtative repug
They both spend money they don't have.
|
|
|
Posted On: Nov 5 2009 4:27PM
BS, there was a belief in God, not christanity.
|
|
|
Posted On: Nov 7 2009 7:11PM
People came over here from other countries so that they could practice their religion of choice without being persecuted. I don't see anywhere in the constitution where it states that Christianity is our countries sole religion. Politics is politics...religion is religion...mix them up and you get illogical thinking governments. Or should I spell it out.... Wars
|
|
|
Posted On: Nov 7 2009 8:01PM
It probably doesn't state anywhere that Christianity is our sole religion, but this country was started, based on Christianity.
I'm so fed up with this messed up congress! I think each state should just have TWO congressmen, a D and an R. Period. Then congress would be evenly balanced. The way it is now, bites the big one and doesn't work. It would work if it was even steven, because you would always have an R or a D that would vote with the other side. The way it is now is way out of balance. Screwed up beyond all recognition. SUBAR!!
|
|
|
Posted On: Nov 7 2009 9:25PM
Our country was based on belief in God... Not Christianity, there was debate about even mentioning God in the founding documents because they were worried one religion or another would try and propagandize it.
Thomas Paine was not a Christian
Thomas Jefferson was not a Christian
Ethan Allan was not a Christian.
Ben Franklin was not a Christian
George Washington, John Adams, and others publicly voiced doubts and displeasure with Christians.
When they talk about God they talk about him in a Deist tone. Which many of the founding fathers were.
|
|
|
Posted On: Nov 7 2009 10:00PM
I think most here know what we're talking about. God IS Christianity.
|
|
|
Posted On: Nov 7 2009 11:17PM
How is God Christianity?
|
|
|
Posted On: Nov 8 2009 11:14AM
I also believe God and Christianity go hand in hand.
Otherwise you have buddah, ali, "aliens" scientology, etc...
|
|
|
Posted On: Nov 8 2009 12:01PM
SickO, if you aren't a Christian then you probably wouldn't get it. It's probably not important to you then.
|
|
|
Posted On: Nov 8 2009 12:39PM
When they talk about a God they are not talking about a Jesus or his Father. They are talking about a creator whoever that creator maybe. It is ambiguous "God" for a reason. So as not to endorse one religion over another.Most of the founding fathers were Deists. You need to read "God: in those terms. Deists typically reject most supernatural events (prophecy, miracles) and tend to assert that God (or "The Supreme Architect") has a plan for the universe that is not altered either by God intervening in the affairs of human life or by suspending the natural laws of the universe. What organized religions see as divine revelation and holy books, most deists see as interpretations made by other humans, rather than as authoritative sources.Deism became prominent in the 17th and 18th centuries especially in what is now the United Kingdom, France, United States and Ireland, mostly among those raised as Christians who found they could not believe in either a triune God, the divinity of Jesus, miracles, or the inerrancy of scriptures, but who did believe in one god. Initially it did not form any congregations, but in time deism strongly influenced other religious groups.
I was raised Christian and in a few different churches. I believe there is a God I just don't know if I believe he intervenes, in the ways that are claimed. So I guess I would be more closely related to Deism.
|
|
|
|
|
Viewing page 1 of 2
|
Next Page>>
go to page: 1, 2
|
|
|
<< Back to the entertainment Forum
Related Topics
|